↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the Risk of Team Sport Injuries: A Narrative Review of Different Statistical Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
88 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling the Risk of Team Sport Injuries: A Narrative Review of Different Statistical Approaches
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00829
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua D. Ruddy, Stuart J. Cormack, Rod Whiteley, Morgan D. Williams, Ryan G. Timmins, David A. Opar

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 13 6%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 58 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 67 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Engineering 8 4%
Mathematics 4 2%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 64 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#812,719
of 26,530,858 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#445
of 15,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,740
of 363,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#14
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,530,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.