The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison Between Manual and (Semi-)Automated Analyses of Esophageal Diaphragm Electromyography During Endurance Cycling in Patients With COPD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00885 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sauwaluk Dacha, Luc Janssens, Antenor Rodrigues, Zafeiris Louvaris, Lotte Janssens, Rik Gosselink, Daniel Langer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 83% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,360,452
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,406
of 15,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,028
of 363,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#95
of 392 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 392 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.