The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Multicenter, International Cohort Analysis of 1435 Cases to Support Clinical Trial Design in Acute Pancreatitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.01092 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nelli Farkas, Lilla Hanák, Alexandra Mikó, Judit Bajor, Patrícia Sarlós, József Czimmer, Áron Vincze, Szilárd Gódi, Dániel Pécsi, Péter Varjú, Katalin Márta, Péter Jenő Hegyi, Bálint Erőss, Zsolt Szakács, Tamás Takács, László Czakó, Balázs Németh, Dóra Illés, Balázs Kui, Erika Darvasi, Ferenc Izbéki, Adrienn Halász, Veronika Dunás-Varga, László Gajdán, József Hamvas, Mária Papp, Ildikó Földi, Krisztina Eszter Fehér, Márta Varga, Klára Csefkó, Imola Török, Farkas Hunor-Pál, Artautas Mickevicius, Elena Ramirez Maldonado, Ville Sallinen, János Novák, Ali Tüzün Ince, Shamil Galeev, Barnabás Bod, János Sümegi, Petr Pencik, Attila Szepes, Andrea Szentesi, Andrea Párniczky, Péter Hegyi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 44% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,295
of 15,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,119
of 353,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#231
of 345 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 345 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.