↓ Skip to main content

Calcaneal Tendon Plasticity Following Gastrocnemius Muscle Injury in Rat

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calcaneal Tendon Plasticity Following Gastrocnemius Muscle Injury in Rat
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.01098
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabrício Reichert Barin, Ivo Vieira de Sousa Neto, Graciele Vieira Ramos, Alexander Szojka, Amanda Lima Ruivo, Carla Tatiana Mota Anflor, José David Hurtado Agualimpia, Allan Corrêa Domingues, Octávio Luiz Franco, Adetola B. Adesida, João Luiz Quaglioti Durigan, Rita de Cassia Marqueti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Professor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Engineering 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 16 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,578,452
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,557
of 13,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,143
of 340,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#265
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.