The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physiological and Biochemical Effects of Intrinsically High and Low Exercise Capacities Through Multiomics Approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.01201 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu-Tang Tung, Yi-Ju Hsu, Chen-Chung Liao, Shang-Tse Ho, Chi-Chang Huang, Wen-Ching Huang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 60 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,858,400
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,211
of 13,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,408
of 342,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#86
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.