The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing Chronotypes by Ambulatory Circadian Monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.01396 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Martinez-Nicolas, Maria Jose Martinez-Madrid, Pedro Francisco Almaida-Pagan, Maria-Angeles Bonmati-Carrion, Juan Antonio Madrid, Maria Angeles Rol |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,058,508
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,794
of 13,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,344
of 457,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#123
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.