The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Disrupted Glutamate Signaling in Drosophila Generates Locomotor Rhythms in Constant Light
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00145 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Renata Van De Maas de Azevedo, Celia Hansen, Ko-Fan Chen, Ezio Rosato, Charalambos P. Kyriacou |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 25% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,718,998
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,540
of 14,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,274
of 363,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#127
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.