↓ Skip to main content

How Non-invasive in vivo Cell Tracking Supports the Development and Translation of Cancer Immunotherapies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Non-invasive in vivo Cell Tracking Supports the Development and Translation of Cancer Immunotherapies
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.00154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madeleine Iafrate, Gilbert O. Fruhwirth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 10%
Chemistry 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 27 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,240,114
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,176
of 13,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,990
of 371,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#46
of 350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.