↓ Skip to main content

A Novel MRI-Based Finite Element Modeling Method for Calculation of Myocardial Ischemia Effect in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel MRI-Based Finite Element Modeling Method for Calculation of Myocardial Ischemia Effect in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.00158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yue Zhang, Vicky Y. Wang, Ashley E. Morgan, Jiwon Kim, Liang Ge, Julius M. Guccione, Jonathan W. Weinsaft, Mark B. Ratcliffe

Abstract

Functional Mitral Regurgitation (FMR) associated with coronary artery disease affects nearly 3 million patients in the United States. Both myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemia contribute to FMR development but uncertainty as to which patients will respond to revascularization (REVASC) of ischemia alone prevents rational decision making about FMR therapy. The aim of this study was to create patient-specific cardiac MRI (CMR) informed finite element (FE) models of the left ventricle (LV), calculate regional LV systolic contractility and then use optimized systolic material properties to simulate the effect of revascularization (virtual REVASC). We describe a novel FE method able to predict the effect of myocardial ischemia on regional LV function. CMR was obtained in five patients with multi-vessel coronary disease and FMR before and 3 months after percutaneous REVASC and a single healthy volunteer. Patient-specific FE models were created and divided into 17 sectors where the systolic contractility parameter, T m a x of each sector was a function of regional stress perfusion (SP-CMR) and myocardial infarction (LGE-CMR) scores. Sector-specific circumferential and longitudinal end-systolic strain and LV volume from CSPAMM were used in a formal optimization to determine the sector based myocardial contractility, T m a x and ischemia effect, α. Virtual REVASC was simulated by setting α to zero. The FE optimization successfully converged with good agreement between calculated and experimental end-systolic strain and LV volumes. Specifically, the optimized T max for the healthy myocardium for five patients and the volunteer was 495.1, 336.8, 173.5, 227.9, 401.4, and 218.9 kPa. The optimized α was found to be 1.0, 0.44, and 0.08 for Patients 1, 2, and 3, and 0 for Patients 4 and 5. The calculated average of radial strain for Patients 1, 2, and 3 at baseline and after virtual REVASC was 0.23 and 0.25, respectively. We developed a novel computational method able to predict the effect of myocardial ischemia in patients with FMR. This method can be used to predict the effect of ischemia on the regional myocardium and promises to facilitate better understanding of FMR response to REVASC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2020.
All research outputs
#20,610,517
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,583
of 13,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,161
of 364,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#238
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.