The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
IL-4 Receptor α Chain Protects the Kidney Against Tubule-Interstitial Injury Induced by Albumin Overload
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00172 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Diogo B. Peruchetti, João Luiz Silva-Filho, Rodrigo P. Silva-Aguiar, Douglas E. Teixeira, Christina M. Takiya, Mariana C. Souza, Maria das Graças Henriques, Ana Acacia S. Pinheiro, Celso Caruso-Neves |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 27% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2020.
All research outputs
#13,598,129
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,639
of 13,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,821
of 360,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#104
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.