The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Greater Short-Time Recovery of Peripheral Fatigue After Short- Compared With Long-Duration Time Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00399 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Froyd, Fernando G. Beltrami, Guillaume Y. Millet, Brian R. MacIntosh, Timothy D. Noakes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,060,974
of 23,208,901 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#7,316
of 13,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,100
of 387,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#213
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,208,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.