You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Validity of the Session Rating of Perceived Exertion Method for Measuring Internal Training Load in Professional Classical Ballet Dancers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00480 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph W. Shaw, Matthew Springham, Derrick D. Brown, Adam M. Mattiussi, Charles R. Pedlar, Jamie Tallent |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 45% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 71% |
| Scientists | 9 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 25 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,211,401
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#664
of 15,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,985
of 390,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#17
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.