The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maximal Voluntary Ventilation Should Not Be Estimated From the Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second in Healthy People and COPD Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00537 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matías Otto-Yáñez, Antônio José Sarmento da Nóbrega, Rodrigo Torres-Castro, Palomma Russelly Saldanha Araújo, Catharinne Angélica Carvalho de Farias, Armele de Fátima Dornelas De Andrade, Homero Puppo, Vanessa Regiane Resqueti, Guilherme Augusto de Freitas Fregonezi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,801,945
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,478
of 13,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,646
of 398,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#62
of 493 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 493 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.