↓ Skip to main content

Small Things Matter: Relevance of MicroRNAs in Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Small Things Matter: Relevance of MicroRNAs in Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.00793
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linsey J. F. Peters, Erik A. L. Biessen, Mathias Hohl, Christian Weber, Emiel P. C. van der Vorst, Donato Santovito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 3%
Professor 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 27 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 29 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#13,317,563
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,315
of 13,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,678
of 397,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#201
of 506 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 506 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.