The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Restoring Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Mice Fails to Fully Reverse Vascular Stiffness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00824 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jochen Steppan, Sandeep Jandu, William Savage, Huilei Wang, Sara Kang, Roshini Narayanan, Daniel Nyhan, Lakshmi Santhanam |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,092,536
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,815
of 13,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,002
of 399,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#243
of 486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.