↓ Skip to main content

The Free Achilles Tendon Is Shorter, Stiffer, Has Larger Cross-Sectional Area and Longer T2* Relaxation Time in Trained Middle-Distance Runners Compared to Healthy Controls

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
55 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Free Achilles Tendon Is Shorter, Stiffer, Has Larger Cross-Sectional Area and Longer T2* Relaxation Time in Trained Middle-Distance Runners Compared to Healthy Controls
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.00965
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Devaprakash, Steven J. Obst, David G. Lloyd, Rod S. Barrett, Ben Kennedy, Iain Ball, Kahlee L. Adams, Tyler J. Collings, Giorgio Davico, Adam Hunter, Nicole Vlahovich, David L. Pease, Claudio Pizzolato

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 24 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 15 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 32 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,185,559
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#648
of 15,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,894
of 426,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#23
of 423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.