You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Analysis of Lower Genital Tract Microbiome Between PCOS and Healthy Women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.01108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yaoyao Tu, Guangyong Zheng, Guolian Ding, Yanting Wu, Ji Xi, Yingzhou Ge, Hangchao Gu, Yingyu Wang, Jianzhong Sheng, Xinmei Liu, Li Jin, Hefeng Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#18,741,816
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#8,348
of 13,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,974
of 400,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#273
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.