↓ Skip to main content

Skeletal Muscle-Derived Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Influence of Different Culture Conditions on Proliferative and Myogenic Capabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Skeletal Muscle-Derived Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Influence of Different Culture Conditions on Proliferative and Myogenic Capabilities
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.553198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Testa, Carles Sánchez Riera, Ersilia Fornetti, Federica Riccio, Claudia Fuoco, Sergio Bernardini, Jacopo Baldi, Marco Costantini, Maria Laura Foddai, Stefano Cannata, Cesare Gargioli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 21 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 22%
Materials Science 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 24 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#18,756,555
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#8,354
of 13,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,211
of 376,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#263
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.