The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Training Specificity of Inspiratory Muscle Training Methods: A Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.576595 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marine Van Hollebeke, Rik Gosselink, Daniel Langer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 5 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Suriname | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 68% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,481,060
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#819
of 15,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,443
of 520,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#28
of 445 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 445 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.