The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
RNase A Treatment Interferes With Leukocyte Recruitment, Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation, and Angiogenesis in Ischemic Muscle Tissue
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.576736 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Manuel Lasch, Konda Kumaraswami, Simona Nasiscionyte, Susanna Kircher, Dominic van den Heuvel, Sarah Meister, Hellen Ishikawa-Ankerhold, Elisabeth Deindl |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 22% |
Student > Master | 4 | 22% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#18,632,069
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#8,260
of 13,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,597
of 419,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#285
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.