↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Distinct Electrophysiological Parameters in Rectal Biopsies for the Choice of the Best Diagnosis/Prognosis Biomarkers for Cystic Fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of Distinct Electrophysiological Parameters in Rectal Biopsies for the Choice of the Best Diagnosis/Prognosis Biomarkers for Cystic Fibrosis
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2020.604580
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris A. L. Silva, Aires Duarte, Fernando A. L. Marson, Raquel Centeio, Tereza Doušová, Karl Kunzelmann, Margarida D. Amaral

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#14,039,778
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,962
of 13,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,058
of 504,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#177
of 449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.