↓ Skip to main content

The Female Menstrual Cycles Effect on Strength and Power Parameters in High-Level Female Team Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Female Menstrual Cycles Effect on Strength and Power Parameters in High-Level Female Team Athletes
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.600668
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus S. Dasa, Morten Kristoffersen, Elisabeth Ersvær, Lars Peder Bovim, Lise Bjørkhaug, Rolf Moe-Nilssen, Jørn V. Sagen, Inger Haukenes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Researcher 8 4%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 111 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 46 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 118 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,664,572
of 26,284,763 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#914
of 15,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,661
of 457,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#34
of 522 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,284,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 522 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.