↓ Skip to main content

Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Brain Endothelial Cells: Current Controversies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Brain Endothelial Cells: Current Controversies
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.642812
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tyler M. Lu, José Gabriel Barcia Durán, Sean Houghton, Shahin Rafii, David Redmond, Raphaël Lis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 26 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,510,593
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,526
of 15,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,545
of 457,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#138
of 488 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 488 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.