↓ Skip to main content

Similar Pain Intensity Reductions and Trunk Strength Improvements Following Whole-Body Electromyostimulation vs. Whole-Body Vibration vs. Conventional Back-Strengthening Training in Chronic Non-specifi…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Similar Pain Intensity Reductions and Trunk Strength Improvements Following Whole-Body Electromyostimulation vs. Whole-Body Vibration vs. Conventional Back-Strengthening Training in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain Patients: A Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.664991
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Micke, Anja Weissenfels, Nicolas Wirtz, Simon von Stengel, Ulrike Dörmann, Matthias Kohl, Heinz Kleinöder, Lars Donath, Wolfgang Kemmler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 36 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 10 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Unspecified 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 38 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,921,535
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,010
of 14,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,547
of 436,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#80
of 482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.