↓ Skip to main content

Properties and Differential Expression of H+ Receptors in Dorsal Root Ganglia: Is a Labeled-Line Coding for Acid Nociception Possible?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Properties and Differential Expression of H+ Receptors in Dorsal Root Ganglia: Is a Labeled-Line Coding for Acid Nociception Possible?
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.733267
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omar Páez, Pedro Segura-Chama, Angélica Almanza, Francisco Pellicer, Francisco Mercado

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Sports and Recreations 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,511,215
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,431
of 14,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,853
of 439,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#204
of 707 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 707 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.