The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Characterising an Alternative Murine Model of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2021.734320 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mitchel Tate, Darnel Prakoso, Andrew M. Willis, Cheng Peng, Minh Deo, Cheng Xue Qin, Jesse L. Walsh, David M. Nash, Charles D. Cohen, Alex K. Rofe, Arpeeta Sharma, Helen Kiriazis, Daniel G. Donner, Judy B. De Haan, Anna M. D. Watson, Miles J. De Blasio, Rebecca H. Ritchie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 50% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,686,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#6,887
of 14,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,809
of 432,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#328
of 687 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 687 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.