↓ Skip to main content

Uncertainty Quantification of Regional Cardiac Tissue Properties in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Using Adaptive Multiple Importance Sampling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uncertainty Quantification of Regional Cardiac Tissue Properties in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Using Adaptive Multiple Importance Sampling
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.738926
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick van Osta, Feddo P. Kirkels, Tim van Loon, Tijmen Koopsen, Aurore Lyon, Roel Meiburg, Wouter Huberts, Maarten J. Cramer, Tammo Delhaas, Kristina H. Haugaa, Arco J. Teske, Joost Lumens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,173,379
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,136
of 14,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,329
of 433,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#180
of 686 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 686 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.