↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Different Tissue Flossing Applications on Range of Motion, Maximum Voluntary Contraction, and H-Reflex in Young Martial Arts Fighters

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Different Tissue Flossing Applications on Range of Motion, Maximum Voluntary Contraction, and H-Reflex in Young Martial Arts Fighters
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.752641
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miloš Kalc, Samo Mikl, Franci Žökš, Matjaž Vogrin, Thomas Stöggl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 23 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 24 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,155,790
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,845
of 14,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,056
of 435,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#283
of 715 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 715 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.