You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effect and Dose-Response of Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Training on Spasticity in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2021.756200 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chia-Ying Fang, Angela Shin-Yu Lien, Jia-Ling Tsai, Hsiao-Chu Yang, Hsiao-Lung Chan, Rou-Shayn Chen, Ya-Ju Chang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 19% |
| Engineering | 7 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,488,047
of 26,139,724 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,070
of 15,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,788
of 527,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#151
of 646 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,139,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 646 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.