↓ Skip to main content

Improved Ablation Efficiency in PVI Guided by Contact Force and Local Impedance: Chronic Canine Model

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved Ablation Efficiency in PVI Guided by Contact Force and Local Impedance: Chronic Canine Model
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2021.808541
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah R. Gutbrod, Allan Shuros, Vijay Koya, Michelle Alexander-Curtis, Lauren Lehn, Kimberly Miklos, John Paul Mounsey, Jason D. Meyers

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,652,849
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,339
of 13,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,576
of 504,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#83
of 714 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 714 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.