The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Acupuncture vs. antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2022.1001978 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yun-zhou Shi, Qing-feng Tao, Di Qin, Min Chen, Shu-guang Yu, Hui Zheng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 10% |
France | 1 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,621,769
of 26,381,140 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,444
of 15,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,729
of 446,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#33
of 789 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 789 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.