↓ Skip to main content

Retraction: High glucose activated cardiac fibroblasts by a disruption of mitochondria-associated membranes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction: High glucose activated cardiac fibroblasts by a disruption of mitochondria-associated membranes
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.1006459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frontiers Editorial Office

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#15,575,964
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#6,811
of 13,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,224
of 433,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#307
of 741 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 741 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.