You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The significance of cephalopod beaks as a research tool: An update
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2022.1038064 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
José C. Xavier, Alexey V. Golikov, José P. Queirós, Catalina Perales-Raya, Rigoberto Rosas-Luis, José Abreu, Giambattista Bello, Paco Bustamante, Juan C. Capaz, Valerie H. Dimkovikj, Angel F. González, Hugo Guímaro, Airam Guerra-Marrero, José N. Gomes-Pereira, Jorge Hernández-Urcera, Tsunemi Kubodera, Vladimir Laptikhovsky, Evgenia Lefkaditou, Fedor Lishchenko, Amanda Luna, Bilin Liu, Graham J. Pierce, Vasco Pissarra, Elodie Reveillac, Evgeny V. Romanov, Rui Rosa, Marjorie Roscian, Lisa Rose-Mann, Isabelle Rouget, Pilar Sánchez, Antoni Sánchez-Márquez, Sónia Seixas, Louise Souquet, Jaquelino Varela, Erica A. G. Vidal, Yves Cherel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
Portugal | 2 | 15% |
Guinea-Bissau | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 25% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 22% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,684,203
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,883
of 14,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,141
of 403,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#34
of 612 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 612 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.