The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training Improves Scalene and Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Oxygenation Parameters in Patients With Weaning Difficulties: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2022.786575 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marine Van Hollebeke, Diego Poddighe, Beatrix Clerckx, Jan Muller, Greet Hermans, Rik Gosselink, Daniel Langer, Zafeiris Louvaris |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
| Belgium | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Greece | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 68% |
| Scientists | 10 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#944,301
of 23,953,397 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#517
of 14,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,722
of 509,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#15
of 749 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,953,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 749 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.