↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Hypoxia–Hyperoxia Preconditioning on Indicators of Muscle Damage After Acute Resistance Exercise in Male Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Hypoxia–Hyperoxia Preconditioning on Indicators of Muscle Damage After Acute Resistance Exercise in Male Athletes
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.824210
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng-Wen Chen, Chi-Chieh Hsu, Li-Fan Lai, Chung-Pu Chi, Szu-Hsien Yu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 13 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 14 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#19,012,063
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#8,539
of 14,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,012
of 442,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#372
of 728 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 728 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.