You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Refining Our Understanding of the Flow Through Coronary Artery Branches; Revisiting Murray’s Law in Human Epicardial Coronary Arteries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2022.871912 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel J. Taylor, Jeroen Feher, Ian Halliday, D. Rodney Hose, Rebecca Gosling, Louise Aubiniere-Robb, Marcel van ‘t Veer, Danielle Keulards, Pim A. L. Tonino, Michel Rochette, Julian Gunn, Paul D. Morris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Egypt | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
| Engineering | 3 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,169,303
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,437
of 14,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,177
of 444,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#137
of 758 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 758 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.