The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CasEcR and CasMIH Genes in the Blue Crab, Callinectes sapidus: A Temporal Evaluation and Melatonin Effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2022.903060 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Dantas David, Leonardo Vinícius Monteiro de Assis, Maria Nathalia Moraes, Flávia Pinheiro Zanotto, Ana Maria de Lauro Castrucci |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,341,003
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,534
of 13,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,870
of 440,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#155
of 640 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 640 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.