The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inspiratory muscle strength training for lowering blood pressure and improving endothelial function in postmenopausal women: comparison with “standard of care” aerobic exercise
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2022.967478 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel H. Craighead, Kaitlin A. Freeberg, Narissa P. McCarty, Matthew J. Rossman, Kerrie L. Moreau, Zhiying You, Michel Chonchol, Douglas R. Seals |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 23 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 17% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 25 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,523,554
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,095
of 14,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,836
of 433,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#89
of 778 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 778 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.