↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Phenotypic variability in iPSC-induced cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts carrying diverse LMNA mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Phenotypic variability in iPSC-induced cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts carrying diverse LMNA mutations
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2022.974151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiajia Yang, Mariana A. Argenziano, Mariana Burgos Angulo, Alexander Bertalovitz, Maliheh Najari Beidokhti, Thomas V. McDonald

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#20,766,515
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,685
of 14,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,086
of 433,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#502
of 780 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 780 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.