↓ Skip to main content

To bead or not to bead: A review of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection models for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To bead or not to bead: A review of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection models for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2023.1104856
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Reyne, Alexandra McCarron, Patricia Cmielewski, David Parsons, Martin Donnelley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 15 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 15 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#15,236,451
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,896
of 14,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,475
of 406,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#174
of 576 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 576 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.