↓ Skip to main content

Conduction system pacing is superior to biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: Insights from the pooled clinical studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conduction system pacing is superior to biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: Insights from the pooled clinical studies
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2023.1125340
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jie Zhang, Feng Li, Zhi-Yuan Zhang, Fan Yang, Qi Kong, Jia-Yi Chen, Lei Zhang, Huan-Huan Liu, Xu-Fei Chen, Yu-Heng Ye, Ru-Xing Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#21,043,858
of 23,680,154 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,817
of 14,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,862
of 205,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#123
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,680,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.