The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Labeled breath tests in patients with NASH: Octanoate oxidation relates best to measures of glucose metabolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2023.1172675 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justine M. Mucinski, Alisha M. Perry, Talyia M. Fordham, Alberto Diaz-Arias, Jamal A. Ibdah, R. Scott Rector, Elizabeth J. Parks |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#15,448,798
of 23,727,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,982
of 14,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,575
of 277,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#110
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,727,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.