↓ Skip to main content

The causal associations between growth factors and constipation: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The causal associations between growth factors and constipation: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2023.1204146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiachen Wang, Mingyi Yang, Ke Xu, Xianjie Wan, Jiale Xie, Hui Yu, Jiaxin Fang, Zehua Wang, Peng Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#21,432,417
of 26,303,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,448
of 15,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,580
of 373,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#219
of 431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,303,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.