You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomized controlled study to evaluate the safety and clinical impact of percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in patients with severe COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2023.1223347 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara Seitz, Franziska Bergmayr, Reinhard Kitzberger, Johannes Holbik, Alexander Grieb, Julian Hind, Felix Lucny, Alexander Tyercha, Stephanie Neuhold, Claus Krenn, Christoph Wenisch, Alexander Zoufaly, Eugenijus Kaniusas, József Constantin Széles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Comoros | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,685,994
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#7,694
of 15,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,479
of 363,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#159
of 428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.