↓ Skip to main content

Cryptochromes in mammals: a magnetoreception misconception?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryptochromes in mammals: a magnetoreception misconception?
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2023.1250798
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Zhang, E. Pascal Malkemper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,414,984
of 26,489,229 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,436
of 15,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,993
of 366,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#53
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,489,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.