The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 on neuromuscular efficiency after a half-marathon
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2023.1254985 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chia-Hsien Yu, Chang-Chi Lai, Jing-Hsuan Chen, I-Cheng Chen, Hsia-Ling Tai, Szu-Kai Fu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Paraguay | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,386,291
of 26,595,536 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#754
of 15,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,553
of 398,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#8
of 335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,595,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.