The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Higher perfusion pressure and pump flow during cardiopulmonary bypass are beneficial for kidney function–a single-centre prospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2024.1257631 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jakub Udzik, Jerzy Pacholewicz, Andrzej Biskupski, Krzysztof Safranow, Iwona Wojciechowska-Koszko, Paweł Kwiatkowski, Paulina Roszkowska, Karolina Rogulska, Violetta Dziedziejko, Zuzanna Marcinowska, Sebastian Kwiatkowski, Ewa Kwiatkowska |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#21,551,906
of 26,455,955 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,512
of 15,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,304
of 390,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#125
of 305 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,455,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 305 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.