↓ Skip to main content

Computational modeling of heart failure in microgravity transitions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational modeling of heart failure in microgravity transitions
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2024.1351985
Authors

Stefan L. Wilson, Klaus-Martin Schulte, Anne Steins, Russell L. Gruen, Emma M. Tucker, Lex M. van Loon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#421,080
of 26,213,600 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#236
of 15,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,153
of 176,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.