↓ Skip to main content

Researcher bias and the enduring gap between the world’s fastest men and women

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Researcher bias and the enduring gap between the world’s fastest men and women
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2024.1360731
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doug Rohrer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,368,521
of 26,077,794 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,413
of 15,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,959
of 344,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#30
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,077,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.