You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mitochondrial dysfunction and its association with age-related disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2024.1384966 |
| Authors |
Indumathi Somasundaram, Samatha M. Jain, Marcel Blot-Chabaud, Surajit Pathak, Antara Banerjee, Sonali Rawat, Neeta Raj Sharma, Asim K. Duttaroy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,487,152
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,368
of 15,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,750
of 152,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.